This page is for sharing cases that we see/ hear/ read in the media or the social/ professional circuit, that highlight or point out -- either directly or indirectly -- the suppressed fact about the universality of man's sexual need for men. This means that ALL MEN HAVE A SEXUAL NEED FOR MEN, unlike what the heterosexualised West claims through its concept of 'sexual orientation'.
Post Case Studies on the Universality of male sexual need for men
You can post here Case Studies on the Universality of man's sexual need for men
7 comments:
Anonymous
said...
This is from personal experience. While enlisted in the military, I've had numerous intimate encounters with "straight" heterosexual masculine males, several of them married with children. None of them consisted of anal intercourse. Mainly just intimate contact, frottage and mutual masturbation. Usually alcohol was involved, but none of them were incapacitated. The alcohol just released inhibitions in my opinion.
Good points. There are some groups forming - notably "G0YS" - spelled w. a zer0 (G00GLE 'em) that are heavily into this form of male/male communication/bonding.
This is in response to the comment above. A lot of people have compared this site to GOYS. However, with due respect to the Goys, we are a totally different concept for several important reasons. some of these are:
- Goys believes in and is based on the concept of sexual orientation. We are dead set against it.
- The very idea of Goy is against what we are saying, that male sexual need for men is a universal need. They say, its restricted to a few individuals -- 'gays' and 'goys'.
- They are a group based on sexual preferences, and their sexual preference is restricted to men. We believe that sexuality is only an important and integral aspect of manhood which has been suppressed. We don't restrict sexuality to only men. It's just that both, sexuality towards men and women have different needs and natures.
- Goys doesn't believe in the Third Gender. We strongly do.
- The concept of Goy, like that of Gay has no relevance whatsoever, outside the artificial western/ westernised and heterosexualised socities.
Hello. About g0ys ... I'm not sure where you are getting your information about them -- but they are very much in tune with the general notion that men are predominantly AmbiSexual (They cite +63% in statistical studies). They do reject the notion of a 3rd gender, but explain that x-gender traits are a result of mind/body phase distortion. In other words: Having (2) parents & having TRAITS from BOTH makes every person MaleAndFemale -- with body, mind & emotions generally wired towards the dominant gender -- but not always in sync due to a number of factors. G0YS philosophy account for all genetic permutations as well as mind/body manifestations of gender polarity. G00GLE 'em: g0ys is spelled with a ZER0.
I don't know what Ambisexual is, and the figure of 63% is way out of the mark as per our experience. Science, because of those who control this institution, cannnot be relied upon to give us the correct picture.
However, I think, the problem with G0y is that this concept has originated in a completley heterosexualised society, and they have kept their goal too low -- to find a 'suitable' place within this heterosexual set up.
We are still not that heterosexualised, and our fight is much much more deep rooted. We want to fight the very forces of heterosexualisation. We don't want a place in it, We want to destroy the heterosexual set up, because it is anti-man and unnatural.
If g0y believes that it is a universal quality of men to seek intimacy with other men, then why do they seek a distinct identity from mainstream men?
They fail to realise that this works as the biggest pressure on men -- they don't want to leave the mainstream male identity (which in the West today is 'straight'). You can't achieve much, unless and until you question the very basic definitions and concepts.
Also, unless and until you recognise the concept of 'third gender', you will never, never understand why men are afraid of a 'gay' or any such identity.
That is what we believe.
Also, they are an ideology, and like other ideologies, they don't want to listen to other points of view. They are not open to a detailed discussion on these topics. This is what I have been told.
With all due respect, I think it is important to unite when it is beneficial. As someone who also disagrees with the strong "sexual orientation"/special-identity bent of g0ys, and also diagrees with them on the concept of a third gender, I think these points are not as important as what unites us, which is a strong emphasis on the near-univerality of male-male desire (we can always disagree on percentages.) g0ys is the only thing in the West close to what is needed and I am willing to support them strongly.
I believe that the only valid concept is about defending this blog on recovery of natural masculinity.
Forget to create non-existent and false identities to make clear the difference between gays and men who like men, since there is no difference between them and the rest of men male.
West, and I am a Westerner, can not continue invented identities that separate man from man, but it has to subvert the very concept of heterosexuality and heteronormativity and invented identities in terms of sexual orientation.
For me to G0ys is a concept that just meet and do not share, solves nothing, still abounding in the division between men of the first kind.
What you need to do is return to the previous situation which existed before they formed the identities currently operating.
7 comments:
This is from personal experience. While enlisted in the military, I've had numerous intimate encounters with "straight" heterosexual masculine males, several of them married with children. None of them consisted of anal intercourse. Mainly just intimate contact, frottage and mutual masturbation. Usually alcohol was involved, but none of them were incapacitated. The alcohol just released inhibitions in my opinion.
Good points. There are some groups forming - notably "G0YS" - spelled w. a zer0 (G00GLE 'em) that are heavily into this form of male/male communication/bonding.
This is in response to the comment above.
A lot of people have compared this site to GOYS.
However, with due respect to the Goys, we are a totally different concept for several important reasons. some of these are:
- Goys believes in and is based on the concept of sexual orientation. We are dead set against it.
- The very idea of Goy is against what we are saying, that male sexual need for men is a universal need. They say, its restricted to a few individuals -- 'gays' and 'goys'.
- They are a group based on sexual preferences, and their sexual preference is restricted to men. We believe that sexuality is only an important and integral aspect of manhood which has been suppressed. We don't restrict sexuality to only men. It's just that both, sexuality towards men and women have different needs and natures.
- Goys doesn't believe in the Third Gender. We strongly do.
- The concept of Goy, like that of Gay has no relevance whatsoever, outside the artificial western/ westernised and heterosexualised socities.
regards.
Hello. About g0ys ... I'm not sure where you are getting your information about them -- but they are very much in tune with the general notion that men are predominantly AmbiSexual (They cite +63% in statistical studies). They do reject the notion of a 3rd gender, but explain that x-gender traits are a result of mind/body phase distortion. In other words: Having (2) parents & having TRAITS from BOTH makes every person MaleAndFemale -- with body, mind & emotions generally wired towards the dominant gender -- but not always in sync due to a number of factors. G0YS philosophy account for all genetic permutations as well as mind/body manifestations of gender polarity. G00GLE 'em: g0ys is spelled with a ZER0.
Hi,
I don't know what Ambisexual is, and the figure of 63% is way out of the mark as per our experience. Science, because of those who control this institution, cannnot be relied upon to give us the correct picture.
However, I think, the problem with G0y is that this concept has originated in a completley heterosexualised society, and they have kept their goal too low -- to find a 'suitable' place within this heterosexual set up.
We are still not that heterosexualised, and our fight is much much more deep rooted. We want to fight the very forces of heterosexualisation. We don't want a place in it, We want to destroy the heterosexual set up, because it is anti-man and unnatural.
If g0y believes that it is a universal quality of men to seek intimacy with other men, then why do they seek a distinct identity from mainstream men?
They fail to realise that this works as the biggest pressure on men -- they don't want to leave the mainstream male identity (which in the West today is 'straight'). You can't achieve much, unless and until you question the very basic definitions and concepts.
Also, unless and until you recognise the concept of 'third gender', you will never, never understand why men are afraid of a 'gay' or any such identity.
That is what we believe.
Also, they are an ideology, and like other ideologies, they don't want to listen to other points of view. They are not open to a detailed discussion on these topics. This is what I have been told.
regards,
With all due respect, I think it is important to unite when it is beneficial. As someone who also disagrees with the strong "sexual orientation"/special-identity bent of g0ys, and also diagrees with them on the concept of a third gender, I think these points are not as important as what unites us, which is a strong emphasis on the near-univerality of male-male desire (we can always disagree on percentages.) g0ys is the only thing in the West close to what is needed and I am willing to support them strongly.
Rayoverde from Santander, Cantabria (Spain).
I believe that the only valid concept is about defending this blog on recovery of natural masculinity.
Forget to create non-existent and false identities to make clear the difference between gays and men who like men, since there is no difference between them and the rest of men male.
West, and I am a Westerner, can not continue invented identities that separate man from man, but it has to subvert the very concept of heterosexuality and heteronormativity and invented identities in terms of sexual orientation.
For me to G0ys is a concept that just meet and do not share, solves nothing, still abounding in the division between men of the first kind.
What you need to do is return to the previous situation which existed before they formed the identities currently operating.
Post a Comment